Hello,
I've searched about this a lot but could not find a good answer.
I won't ever use OpenVZ in a million years. So, is there any downside using a newer kernel with Proxmox?
I noticed that in the past there was some different kernel branches like 2.6.35 (without OpenVZ) but they got discontinued. Any reason why?
Would it be possible to create a new Proxmox branch for only KVM with latest kernels? I think this will have lots of advantages while keeping the support for OpenVZ on the current branch. I know this will double the work for developers. But it might be a good idea since there is a trend to use KVM and with this Proxmox can really make a huge difference over other alternatives.
If anyone is wondering why I'm looking to use newer kernels is because of libguestfs.
Oktay
I've searched about this a lot but could not find a good answer.
I won't ever use OpenVZ in a million years. So, is there any downside using a newer kernel with Proxmox?
I noticed that in the past there was some different kernel branches like 2.6.35 (without OpenVZ) but they got discontinued. Any reason why?
Would it be possible to create a new Proxmox branch for only KVM with latest kernels? I think this will have lots of advantages while keeping the support for OpenVZ on the current branch. I know this will double the work for developers. But it might be a good idea since there is a trend to use KVM and with this Proxmox can really make a huge difference over other alternatives.
If anyone is wondering why I'm looking to use newer kernels is because of libguestfs.
Oktay