Hi,
A benchmarking on vsphere, hyper-v, proxmox and xen was published on Tom's Hardware
http://www.tomshardware.fr/articles/...ere,2-907.html
Bad performance so bad publicity for proxmox...
The bench was made with local disks and network storage.
Tests are made with qcow2 disk, i have reported a raw disk would provide best performances. But it's doesn't explain everything.
Some feedbacks on these benchmarking by the proxmox team ?
The reporter is open to explanation on these bad results.
Bye,
groy
A benchmarking on vsphere, hyper-v, proxmox and xen was published on Tom's Hardware
http://www.tomshardware.fr/articles/...ere,2-907.html
Bad performance so bad publicity for proxmox...
The bench was made with local disks and network storage.
Tests are made with qcow2 disk, i have reported a raw disk would provide best performances. But it's doesn't explain everything.
Some feedbacks on these benchmarking by the proxmox team ?
The reporter is open to explanation on these bad results.
Bye,
groy